Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /sites/iisj-international.com/index.php on line 38

Warning: file_put_contents(/sites/iisj-international.com/cache/www.iisj.net/en/review-form-2026-workshop-applicationshilbinkfoxapariciowojtanowskiguiloff/index.html): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /sites/iisj-international.com/index.php on line 104
Review form for 2026 workshop applications_HILBINK_FOX_APARICIO_WOJTANOWSKI_GUILOFF | Instituto Internacional de Sociología Jurídica de Oñati

Review form for 2026 workshop applications_HILBINK_FOX_APARICIO_WOJTANOWSKI_GUILOFF

Name of reviewer: *

Title: "The Legal Complex and Autocratization: Resistance, Cooperation and Repair"

COORDINATORS: Lisa HILBINK, Benjamin GARCIA-HOLGADO and Yasser KURESHI

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Consuming Property in the Information Age"

COORDINATORS: Lorna FOX O’MAHONY, Tim DODSWORTH, Shelly KREICZER-LEVY and Marc L. ROARK

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Housing and property in the framework of the housing crisis"

COORDINATORS: Marco APARICIO WILHELMI, Irene SABATÉ MURIEL and Miguel RUIZ DÍAZ-REIXA

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Academia in the Era of Culture Wars: University Ethos and Academic Freedom of Expression"

COORDINATOR: Mateusz WOJTANOWSKI

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Title: "Realism, Institutionalism and Experimentalism"

COORDINATORS: Matías GUILOFF and Diogo COUTINHO

1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) *

Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) *

Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) *

Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner?

	1	2	3	4	5
Your score: (max. 5 points) *	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4	Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5

Your comments: *

(In key words or bullet points)

Overall scoring: *

Considering my above scores and comments for the applications I was assigned to review, I arrive at the following ranking of the selected applications:

	A (best)	B (medium)	C (lowest)
The Legal Complex and Autocratization: Resistance, Cooperation and Repair *	The Legal Complex and Autocratization: Resistance, Cooperation and Repair - A (best)	The Legal Complex and Autocratization: Resistance, Cooperation and Repair - B (medium)	The Legal Complex and Autocratization: Resistance, Cooperation and Repair - C (lowest)
Consuming Property in the Information Age *	Consuming Property in the Information Age - A (best)	Consuming Property in the Information Age - B (medium)	Consuming Property in the Information Age - C (lowest)
Housing and property in the framework of the housing crisis *	Housing and property in the framework of the housing crisis - A (best)	Housing and property in the framework of the housing crisis - B (medium)	Housing and property in the framework of the housing crisis - C (lowest)
Academia in the Era of Culture Wars: University Ethos and Academic Freedom of Expression *	Academia in the Era of Culture Wars: University Ethos and Academic Freedom of Expression - A (best)	Academia in the Era of Culture Wars: University Ethos and Academic Freedom of Expression - B (medium)	Academia in the Era of Culture Wars: University Ethos and Academic Freedom of Expression - C (lowest)
Realism, Institutionalism and Experimentalism *	Realism, Institutionalism and Experimentalism - A (best)	Realism, Institutionalism and Experimentalism - B (medium)	Realism, Institutionalism and Experimentalism - C (lowest)

I authorize the IISL to process my assessment information: *

I authorize the Institute to use the information on the evaluation of applications for the evaluation of proposals received and only for that purpose.

YES

NO

Sending date:

Month

Day

Year

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Math question * 3 + 8 =

More information?

For more information:

Workshop Coordination Team

Avenida de la Universidad, 8
Apartado 28
20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa) - Spain
T: +34 943 78... Ver teléfono
E: workshop@iisj.es

Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law

Avenida Universidad 8 - Apartado 28
20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa)
Spain

Support the IISL

The Institute has received many generous individual donations for a number of years.

Make a donation